Understanding Move-on Destinations and Success Rates

Posted by Makerble Templates 7 months ago
Edited by Curated by Makerble 7 monthsago

Makerble Templates's Idea:


Purpose:
How to interpret and report on exit destinations

Content:
Positive Move-on Destinations:

  • Supported housing/hostels (most common positive move-on)
  • Private or social housing (excellent outcome, rare from emergency accommodation)
  • Staying with family/friends (can be positive if sustainable)
  • Residential treatment/rehabilitation (very positive for those with substance use/mental health needs)


Neutral/Temporary:

  • Another emergency accommodation service (still housed but not progressed)
  • Hospital/care facility (necessary but temporary)


Negative Outcomes:

  • Returned to rough sleeping (crisis not resolved)
  • Unknown/lost contact (common in emergency accommodation - often means rough sleeping)
  • Unplanned exits (person left before move-on could be arranged)


Realistic Expectations:
Emergency accommodation is the START of the journey, not the end. Success rates:

  • 40-60% move to supported housing (good outcome)
  • 10-20% return to rough sleeping (unavoidable in crisis services)
  • 20-30% lost contact (reality of working with transient populations)
  • 5-10% move to permanent housing directly (rare but excellent)


Reporting Tips:

  • Report on "housing retention" not just "positive move-on" - even another emergency service is better than streets
  • Track "planned vs unplanned" exits - this shows service quality
  • Be honest about lost contact - don't count as positive outcomes
  • Celebrate the small wins - every night off the streets matters


Tags:
Outcomes, Reporting, Move-on Planning